Kitaez
26.01.2012, 01:31
Вопрос к знатокам, больше даже наверное к реконструкторам.:rolleyes:
Нужны ботинки для сегодняшней зимней погоды. Не только для леса, но в основном ходить по городу: сугробы-метро-постоять-в офис.
Предлагают такие ботинки по сходной цене - Intermediate Cold Wet Boot. (http://ak-inzt.net/clothingandindividualequipment-/206-cold-weather-and-specialty-boots) Или здесь. (http://www.armysurpluswarehouse.com/intermediate-cold-wet-icw-boot-with-gore-texr-fabric-with-removable-liner.html)
Но вот негативные отзывы пользователей: "Отзывы об американском вооружении и экипировке": (http://airsoft.ua/showthread.php?t=887&highlight=Intermediate+Cold+Wet+Boot)
ICWB Lessons Learned
(1) Intermediate Cold Wet Boots (ICWBs)*
All soldiers were issued at least one pair. Some boots not worn-in prior to operational use.
63% of Soldiers had foot problems with these boots.
65% had problems with the soles cracking.
55% had problems with seams coming unstitched.
Soldiers felt the boots were fine for static missions.
Boots were poor for movement.
Too inflexible, thus slipped around.
Got wet from sweat and stayed wet (7-24 hours to dry).
Heavy.
* Troops expressed a desire for a light weight hiking boot such as those used in European armies and made by companies such as Scarpa.
Где правда? :eek:
Нужны ботинки для сегодняшней зимней погоды. Не только для леса, но в основном ходить по городу: сугробы-метро-постоять-в офис.
Предлагают такие ботинки по сходной цене - Intermediate Cold Wet Boot. (http://ak-inzt.net/clothingandindividualequipment-/206-cold-weather-and-specialty-boots) Или здесь. (http://www.armysurpluswarehouse.com/intermediate-cold-wet-icw-boot-with-gore-texr-fabric-with-removable-liner.html)
Но вот негативные отзывы пользователей: "Отзывы об американском вооружении и экипировке": (http://airsoft.ua/showthread.php?t=887&highlight=Intermediate+Cold+Wet+Boot)
ICWB Lessons Learned
(1) Intermediate Cold Wet Boots (ICWBs)*
All soldiers were issued at least one pair. Some boots not worn-in prior to operational use.
63% of Soldiers had foot problems with these boots.
65% had problems with the soles cracking.
55% had problems with seams coming unstitched.
Soldiers felt the boots were fine for static missions.
Boots were poor for movement.
Too inflexible, thus slipped around.
Got wet from sweat and stayed wet (7-24 hours to dry).
Heavy.
* Troops expressed a desire for a light weight hiking boot such as those used in European armies and made by companies such as Scarpa.
Где правда? :eek: